HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS
SOUTH AFRICAN COUNTRY STUDY
Sandra Liebenberg
1. Introduction
2. Apartheid and its legacy
2.1 Human rights violations under apartheid
2.2 The legacy of apartheid
3. Democracy and a New Constitution
3.1 The interim Constitution
3.2 The final Constitution
3.3 Human rights in the final Constitution
4. Dealing with the Past -
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission
5. South Africa and International Human
Rights Law
5.1 The influence of international human
rights law on the Bill of Rights
5.2 Interpreting human rights in South Africa
5.3 Becoming a party to human rights treaties
5.4 Giving effect to international law in
South Africa
5.5 International conferences and programmes
of action
6. Giving Effect to Human Rights - The
Role of the State
6.1 Laws, policies and programmes
a) Labour
b) Housing
c) Land
d) The Environment
e) Gender Equality
f) Equality, access to information and just
administrative action
g) Programmes to advance access to water
and health care services
6.2 The challenges of implementation
7. The Role of Human Rights Institutions
and the Courts
7.1 Human rights institutions
7.2 The Courts
8. The roles of Civil Society, the Media and
the Private Sector
8.1 Civil society advocacy and campaigns
8.2 The media
8.3 The private sector
9. Conclusion
NOTES
1. INTRODUCTION
This study examines key human rights developments in South Africa with a particular focus on their relationship to human development in the country.
The paper's starting point is that a human rights-based approach to development has the following main elements:
2. APARTHEID AND ITS LEGACY
2.1 Human rights violations under apartheid
Human rights developments under the new democratic
government in South Africa can only be understood and appreciated against
the historical background of colonialism and apartheid. These regimes violated
the full spectrum of human rights recognised in the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights (1948). Apartheid policy consisted of the enforced political,
economic and social segregation of people along racial lines. Whites monopolised
the formal institutions of power and enjoyed extensive rights and privileges.
While relative privileges were bestowed on the Coloured and Indian racial
groups, the African majority was the most disadvantaged in all spheres.
This segregation was enforced through a gamut of laws. The cornerstone
of these laws was the Population Registration Act of 1950 which classified
every person according to their ethnic or racial group. As described by
the Constitutional Court,
"Race was the basic, all-pervading and inescapable criterion for participation
by a person in all
aspects of political, economic and social life."3
Political rights were violated by depriving black people of the right to vote and equal participation in political institutions. The policy of separate development pursued by the apartheid government through the creation of 'independent' homelands deprived many African people of their citizenship rights. It eventually resulted in fourteen different administrative systems operating in the country, leading to fragmented governance, inefficiencies and corruption.
Freedom of movement and residence were violated
by laws restricting the settlement of black people in urban areas (influx
control policy), as well as maintaining racially segregated residential
areas through legislation such as the Group Areas Act, 1966. Prof. John
Dugard described the restrictions on movement under apartheid as follows:
"A vast web of statutes and subordinate legislation confine the African
to his tribal homeland and release
him only in the interest of the agricultural and industrial advancement
of the white community. When he
visits a "white area" as a migrant labourer he does so on sufferance, shackled
by the chains of legislation
and administrative decision."4
The control of movement of African people
in South Africa was enforced by the "pass system". The pass was a reference
book which Africans were obliged to carry on them at all times. It was
required for lawful movement into, out of, or within specified areas. Failure
to produce a pass book to a policeman on demand was a criminal offence.
In the course of controlling and suppressing opposition to apartheid policies all civil rights and freedoms such as the right to life, the right against torture and other forms of degrading treatment or punishment, the right to a fair trial and freedom of speech and assembly were violated on a large scale. These took the form of killings, torture, the severe ill-treatment of political prisoners, detentions without trial, the banning of individuals and political organisations such as the African National Congress (ANC) and Pan African Congress (PAC), stringent restrictions on the media, and the prohibition of gatherings and demonstrations. As resistance to the apartheid regime, intensified, particularly from 19765 onwards, the apartheid regime became increasing repressive. It used the law to confer broad powers on the executive and powerful security apparatus. Basic civil liberties were eroded on a large scale under the States of Emergency declared during the 1980s by the apartheid government. Emergency regulations curtailed even further the limited powers of the courts to prevent and redress violations of human rights.
However, the apartheid system should not be equated solely with violations of the civil and political rights of black South Africans. The systematic violation of the economic, social and cultural rights of black South Africans was an integral part of the apartheid project. The Land Acts of 1913 and 1936 restricted the African population to some 13% of the total land area of South Africa. Black people were dispossessed of their land, and forcibly removed to over-crowded reserves. These were far from sources of employment and lacked the infrastructure and services for sustainable development. Poverty, disease and malnutrition were rife. An estimated 3.5 million people were forcibly removed from rural and urban areas, between 1960 and 1980.6 The reserves became pools of cheap migrant labour for white owned farms and mines. Dispossession forced successful black farmers to seek employment as farm labourers thereby becoming insecure occupiers of land or labour tenants. The migrant labour system caused untold suffering, breaking up many African families. The men lived in appalling conditions in the mining compounds and slums of the cities, while many women and children were left to eke out a precarious livelihood in the impoverished rural areas.
Black people suffered gross inequalities in
access to social services, resources and economic opportunities. Black
communities were deliberately underdeveloped, and lacked adequate sanitation,
water and refuse removal services as well as decent housing, schools, and
clinics. Racial segregation was maintained at all levels of the education
system. There were enormous disparities in the per capita expenditure on
the education of black and white children. Thus in 1974 - 1975, the estimated
per capita expenditure on African children in primary and secondary schools
was R39, compared with the amount of about R605 spent on each white child.7
There were large disparities in the amounts of the various social security
grants payable to different racial groups, and in different geographical
areas. Moreover, as one author observed,
"Administrative delays, corruption and inefficiency, particularly in rural
areas, were a form of covert
discrimination for disenfranchised communities." 8
Severe restrictions were placed on the rights of black workers. Job reservation, a product of both statute and convention, reserved many of the skilled and well-paid jobs for whites. In the Western Cape Province government applied a "Coloured labour preference" policy which severely limited the employment opportunities of African work-seekers in the region, and created racial friction between African and Coloured workers. Although it was not illegal to form a trade union, the law only recognised separate trade unions for Whites and Coloureds (which included Indians). Trade unions organising all workers regardless of race were seen as political and repressed. In 1979 the law was amended to provide for the recognition of racially separate trade unions for African workers. But it was only in 1981 that non-racial trade unions were recognised. With recognition came a very limited right to strike.
The right to marry, found a family and associate with whom one chooses were violated by laws which prohibited inter-racial marriage and sexual relations.9 Racial discrimination pervaded all aspects of social and public life. Most public amenities, including rest rooms, toilets, post offices, elevators, restaurants, railway carriages and buses were racially segregated. Where separate facilities were established for black persons, these were inevitably of a vastly inferior standard.
Cultural rights were violated through manipulating the system of African customary law, and codifying it into a rigid system which could not adapt appropriately to social and economic changes. Rural African women were particularly disadvantaged. In a context where traditional ways of life and support systems were rapidly breaking down, they operated under a system where their personal, proprietary and contractual rights were greatly curtailed.10 Culture was also manipulated by colonial and apartheid rulers to bolster the power of certain tribal chiefs and kings in exchange for patronage and complicity in the apartheid system. Black languages were downgraded and enjoyed no official status. English and Afrikaans were the only official languages of the country. The spark that ignited the 1976 student uprising was an attempt to impose Afrikaans as the medium of instruction in African schools.
2.2 The legacy of apartheid
Apartheid left a legacy of deep poverty and
inequality in the country. For a long time South Africa had the highest
measurement of income inequality (Gini coefficient) in the world. Today
only that of Brazil is higher. The poorest 40% of households (equivalent
to 50% of the population) receive only 11% of total income, while the richest
10% of households (equivalent to only 7% of the population) receive over
40% of total income. Inequality of income distribution between race groups
is considerable, and accounts for 37% of total income inequality.11 Poverty
also has strong gender dimensions in South Africa with female-headed households
having a 50% higher poverty rate than male-headed households.12 In all
of the key social indicators, including life expectancy, infant mortality,
illiteracy, fertility and access to safe water, South African fares very
poorly against comparable middle-income countries.13 A study on Poverty
and Inequality in South Africa identifies the poverty traps set by apartheid
as "an important explanation for the persistence of poverty in South Africa."
These relate to the absence of complementary assets and services "and a
poverty of opportunity whereby people are unable to take full advantage
of the few assets that they do have." These conditions reproduce poverty
and perpetuate inequality, particularly in the context where the South
African economy is contracting.14
Redressing this legacy, and achieving human development and the realisation of all human rights remain major challenges for the democratic government in South Africa.
3. DEMOCRACY AND A NEW CONSTITUTION
3.1 The interim Constitution
"This Constitution provides a historic bridge between the past of a deeply
divided society characterised
by strife, conflict, untold suffering and injustice, and a future founded
on the recognition of human rights,
democracy and peaceful co-existence and development opportunities for all
South Africans, irrespective
of colour, race, class, belief or sex."15
The struggles of the liberation movements, the trade unions and ordinary South Africans combined with the moral and economic pressures brought to bear by the international community eventually forced the South African government to the negotiating table in the early 1990's. The Multi-Party Negotiating Process, in which 26 political groupings participated, was the main forum for negotiating what has become know as South Africa's transitional or 'interim' Constitution.16 The first democratic elections in South Africa were held on 27 April 1994 in terms of this Constitution. It also established the framework for the transitional governance of the country, pending the adoption of a final Constitution.
For the first time in South Africa's history the old system of parliamentary sovereignty was replaced by a system of constitutional democracy in which the Constitution is the supreme law of the country. All laws and conduct inconsistent with the Constitution would henceforth be of no force and effect. The interim Constitution also introduced a chapter of justiciable "fundamental rights".17 This chapter includes the traditional civil and political rights such as the rights to vote, to a fair trial, and freedom of speech and assembly. However, it goes beyond these traditional rights and liberties by including what are relatively innovative rights for a national Constitution. Among these rights are the right of access to information (s 23); the right to administrative justice (s 24); a qualified right to the free pursuit of economic activity (s 26); the right to an environment which is not detrimental to health or well-being (s 29); the right of children to security, basic nutrition, basic health and social services (s 30(1)(c)); language and cultural rights (s 31); and educational rights (s 32). Also included are labour rights (s 27) and property rights (s 28). Important constitutional institutions were established in South Africa for the first time, including the Constitutional Court, the Human Rights Commission, and the Commission on Gender Equality.
The procedures for the adoption of the final Constitution were also prescribed in the interim Constitution. The National Assembly and Senate (the two houses of the new democratically-elected parliament) would in joint session form the Constitutional Assembly tasked with drafting and adopting a new Constitution. The interim Constitution also set the parameters for the contents of the final Constitution. Thus the final Constitution had to comply with a set of 34 'Constitutional Principles' appended to the interim Constitution.18 These principles were wide-ranging and included stipulations that the final Constitution contain a justiciable Bill of Rights, prohibit racial, gender and all other forms of discrimination, provide for freedom of information "so that there can be open and accountable administration at all levels of government", protect the diversity of language and culture, and provide for national, provincial and local government powers. Before the final Constitution could come into effect, the Constitutional Court had to certify that it complied with all these principles.
3.2 The final Constitution
The final Constitution was negotiated between
May 1994 and October 1996, and was adopted by an overwhelming majority
of the Constitutional Assembly on 8 May 1996. The Constitutional Court
certified an amended text of the new Constitution on 4 December 199619,
and it came into force on 4 February 1997.20
|
"You've made your mark, now have your say."21 The Constitutional Assembly (CA) was committed to ensuring broad public participation in the drafting of the final Constitution. In the words of the former Chairperson of the CA, Mr. M.C. Ramaphosa: "...in the end the drafting of the Constitution must not be the preserve of the 490 members of this Assembly. It must be a constitution which our people feel they own, a constitution that they know and feel belongs to them."22The challenge was to effectively engage millions of ordinary people in the Constitution-drafting process, particularly the large rural population, most of whom are illiterate and do not have access to print or electronic media. There was also a need for education on the role of a constitution in laying the foundations for human rights, democracy and development in the country. The public participation programme had a number of different elements. The main aims of the media campaign were to inform, educate, and stimulate public interest in the constitutional process, particularly among disadvantaged communities. Extensive use was made of print, radio, television, a national advertising campaign, as well as the production of in-house media. Other communication tools included a regular newsletter (Constitutional Talk), a telephone talk-line, and an Internet home page. Submissions were solicited from the public on all aspects of the new Constitution. Nearly 1.7 million submissions were received in response to this call. Another aspect of the public participation programme was the holding of constitutional public meetings to facilitate face to face interaction between the public and members of the Constitutional Assembly. These meetings were held mainly with rural and disadvantaged communities who do not enjoy easy access to the formal media. Participants in these meetings were able to hear first hand reports on the unfolding process from their elected representatives and to present their own views on the various issues being negotiated by the CA. Workshops with civil society were organised by the Constitutional Educational Programme to assist people to participate meaningfully in the process. In addition to these public meetings, the CA ran a National Sector Public Hearing Programme. In these hearings different sectors of civil society were consulted on the constitutional themes of particular relevance to them. Themes of these hearing included: the judiciary, business, labour, children's rights, women and socio-economic rights. Organisations in civil society also conducted
effective advocacy and lobbying campaigns on various aspects of the Bill
of Rights. For example, women's organisations lobbied successfully for
a right in the Bill of Rights against all forms of public or private violence
(s 12(1)(c)). The Reproductive Rights Alliance played a key role in ensuring
the inclusion of reproductive rights and health in the Bill of Rights (s
12(2)(a)) and s 27(1)(a)). The National Coalition on Gay and Lesbian Equality
helped ensure that the right to equality expressly included sexual orientation
as a prohibited ground of unfair discrimination (s 9(3)).
After the adoption of the Constitution, seven million copies were produced and distributed in all eleven official languages. Distribution of the Constitution took place through schools, post offices, the police, prisons and structures of civil society. It was also accompanied by an illustrated guide, highlighting and explaining in accessible language key aspects of the Constitution. The CA had also made a deliberate decision to draft the Constitution in plain language, avoiding mystifying legal jargon. The distribution took place during 'National Constitution Week' which started on 17 March 1997 and culminated on 21 March 1997, South Africa's national Human Rights Day. During this week a range of activities took place aimed at engendering a sense of ownership of the new Constitution among all sectors of society. The former Executive Director of the CA, Mr. Hassen Ebrahim, describes the significance of the programme in the following terms: "...the public participation programme stands out as a monumental exercise, remaining second in effect and extent only to the April 1994 elections...By empowering civil society to participating in the constitution-making process, the Constitutional Assembly was able to add a new dimension to the concept of democracy in South Africa: that is, a participatory democracy. This set a tough precedent for government and provided a window to what a participatory democracy could achieve." 23 |
3.3 Human rights in the final Constitution
The adoption of the new Constitution represents
a milestone in the history of human rights in South Africa. The preamble
states that the Constitution is adopted so as to:
"Heal the divisions of the past and establish a society based on democratic
values, social justice and
fundamental human rights; Lay the foundations for a democratic and open
society in which government
is based on the will of the people and every citizen is equally protected
by law; Improve the quality of life
of all citizens and free the potential of each person; and Build a united
and democratic South Africa
able to take its rightful place as a sovereign state in the family of nations."
The Bill of Rights is "a cornerstone of democracy in South Africa" and "affirms the democratic values of human dignity, equality and freedom." 24 It integrates a full range of civil and political as well economic, social and cultural rights. It is also innovative in that it moves beyond paying lip-service to the indivisibility and interdependence of human rights. These principles are given concrete effect by subjecting the full range of rights in the Bill of Rights to judicial enforcement. No distinction is thus made between justiciable "first generation rights", and "second generation" rights. The latter group of rights, where they are recognised in national constitutions, are usually relegated to the status of unenforceable directive principles of State policy.25
The economic and social rights recognised in the Constitution include:
The way the socio-economic rights are framed in the Bill of Rights suggests that they should not be regarded as commodities to be dispensed by the State, free of charge to a passive citizenry. The State's primary duty is to create an enabling environment through which people can gain "access to" the various rights. An enabling environment has the following key elements:
These developmental rights are integrally linked to the civil rights in the Bill of Rights, such as the right to equality, freedom of expression, assembly and association, the right of access to information and just administrative action. Equality is a central constitutional value (s 1). Equality "includes the full and equal enjoyment of all rights and freedoms." Legislative and other measures "designed to protect or advance persons, or categories of persons, disadvantaged by unfair discrimination" may be taken in order to promote the achievement of equality (s 9(2)). Prioritising the needs of disadvantaged groups and taking special measures to expand their access to opportunities, resources and services would thus be consonant with the right to equality in the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights gives everyone the right of access to any information held by the State; and information held by private parties that "is required for the exercise or protection of any rights." (s 32). In addition, everyone has the right to administrative action that is "lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair, and to written reasons when their rights have been adversely affected by administrative action." (s 33). National legislation must be enacted to give effect to these rights. These rights can also play an important role in assisting people to gain access to economic and social rights through open and fair procedures.
The possibility of obtaining a remedy through the courts for the violation of any of the rights in the Bill of Rights (including social and economic rights) is a significant safeguard. However, the courts should not be seen as the primary institution for the realisation of the rights in the Bill of Rights. All organs of State are under a duty to "respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights in the Bill of Rights." (s 7(2)). The executives and legislatures within the national, provincial and local spheres of government have a crucial role to play in ensuring that these rights are effectively realised through adopting and implementing effective policies, laws and programmes. The Constitution also creates a number independent institutions supporting constitutional democracy. Their role in the promotion and protection of human rights is examined in part 7.1 below.
Another innovative feature of the South African
Bill of Rights is its application, not only to the State, but also to private
actors such as individuals and companies. Some rights are unambiguously
stated to be binding on private actors: for example, the duty not to discriminate
unfairly (s 9(4)) and to provide information that is required by others
for the exercise or protection of their rights (s 32(1)(b)). In determining
whether, and to what extent, the other rights in the Bill of Rights are
binding on private actors, regard must be had to the nature of the right
and the nature of the duty imposed by that right (s 8(2)). This makes it
possible to argue, for example, that a polluting industry is directly liable
under the Constitution for actions that violate the right to an environment
that is not harmful to health or well-being (s 24(a)).
4. DEALING WITH THE PAST -
THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION
South Africa is now faced with the challenge
of building on the foundations of human rights, democracy and development
laid by the new Constitution. However, it was also critical to understand
and deal with the human rights violations of the past. The Constitution
required the adoption of mechanisms to promote national unity and reconciliation.27
The Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995 was adopted
to give effect to this constitutional imperative. It established a Truth
and Reconciliation Commission (the TRC) with the following objectives:
1) establishing "as complete a picture as
possible of the causes, nature and extent of gross human rights violations"
perpetrated between 1960 and 1994 by conducting investigations and hearings;
2) facilitating the granting of amnesty on
condition of a full, truthful disclosure of acts with a political objective
and complying with the requirements of the Act;
3) establishing and making known the fate
of victims and restoring their human and civil dignity by granting them
an opportunity to relate their own accounts of the violations they suffered,
and by recommending reparation measures;
4) compiling a report of findings which contains
recommendations of measures to prevent future violations of human rights.28
The main focus of the TRC was on gross violations of civil and political rights defined as the killing, abduction, torture or severe ill-treatment of any person.29 However, the Commission also had a mandate to investigate systematic patterns of abuse, and the causes, circumstances and context which led to gross violations of human rights.30 As part of this mandate, the TRC investigated systemic violations of human rights under apartheid. These included public hearings on forced removals, the education system for black people, and the role of different sectors in society such as the health and legal professions, the media, and business under apartheid. Submissions to the TRC were also made by a coalition of organisations in civil society on the importance of properly investigating violations of economic, social and cultural rights under apartheid, as well as making recommendations to governmental and non-governmental bodies on the future protection of these rights in South Africa.31
The final report of the TRC was published in October 1998 in five volumes although the process of considering amnesty applications has not yet been finalised.32
The Commission's findings arising out of the
business sector hearings are illustrative of the active involvement and
the complicity of the private sector in violations of human rights and
the undermining of human development under apartheid.
|
5. SOUTH AFRICA AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
International human rights law has an important role to play in the development of a human rights culture in South Africa. It is applied by a range of institutions and actors in South Africa, including the courts, parliament, the South African Human Rights Commission and organisations of civil society.
5.1 The influence of international human
rights law on the Bill of Rights
International human rights law substantially
influenced the drafting of the Bill of Rights in the final Constitution.
The influence of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights (1966) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) is evident
in the economic, social and cultural rights and the children's rights included
in the Bill of Rights.34 A major issue in the constitutional negotiations
were the demands of Afrikaner groups for the inclusion of special protections
in the Bill of Rights relating to language, culture and education.35 Traditional
leaders also sought constitutional protection for indigenous laws, customs
and institutions. To acknowledge and protect the diversity of language
and culture in South Africa, a right was included in the Bill of Rights
guaranteeing that persons belonging to cultural, religious or linguistic
communities would not be denied the right, with other member of their community,
to enjoy their culture, practise their religion and use their language,
and to form, join and maintain cultural, religious and linguistic associations
and other organs of civil society (s 31)). This clause was modelled on
article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(1966).
5.2 Interpreting human rights in South
Africa
The Constitution also gives international
law a key role in the interpretation of the rights in the Bill of Rights.
Thus a court, tribunal or forum must consider international law when interpreting
the Bill of Rights (s 39(1)(b)). The Constitutional Court has held that
international law in this context would include international instruments
that are binding on South Africa as well as those that are not binding
(e.g. decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights or the European
Court of Human Rights). Both may be used as tools of interpretation.36
The Constitutional Court has referred extensively to international human
rights instruments in the course of its judgements: for example, in considering
the content and scope of -
5.3 Becoming a party to human rights treaties
South Africa has become a party to a number of key human rights treaties, particularly since the introduction of democracy in the country.
South Africa is currently a party to the following international human rights treaties:
South Africa is also a party to
5.4 Giving effect to international law
in South Africa
The South African Constitution provides that
an international agreement only becomes law in South Africa when it is
enacted into law by national legislation.42
Parliament has recently passed the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000. This legislation was passed in fulfilment of the constitutional injunction requiring the enactment of national legislation to prevent or prohibit unfair discrimination (s 9(4)). However, it is also an important vehicle to facilitate compliance with South Africa's international law obligations including treaty obligations in terms of, amongst others, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.43
The Parliamentary Joint Standing Committee on the Improvement of the Quality Of Life and Status of Women prepared a Report on the Government's Implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Beijing Platform for Action (adopted in 1995 by the Fourth World Conference on Women). This report was tabled in parliament in November 1998.44 The report records and evaluates the progress made by various government departments in giving effect to these international commitments. It also identifies key challenges for integrating a gender analysis into the work of government departments and improving the lives of women in South Africa.
5.5 International conferences and programmes
of action
South Africa has participated in a number
of international conferences and the adoption of various Declarations and
Programmes for Action. For example it participated in the World Summit
for Social Development (1995) which adopted the Copenhagen Declaration
and Programme of Action, and the Fourth World Conference on Women (1995)
which adopted the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.
These international instruments provide benchmarks which can be used by State institutions to set goals and monitor progress towards those goals. For example, in terms of the Copenhagen Programme of Action, States agreed to commit 20 per cent of their national budgets to basic social programmes.45 In 1998, the Financial and Fiscal Commission (an institution established by the Constitution) conducted a study to determine the following: how much of the national budget is being spent on basic social services (BSS); the level of this expenditure on the poor; the scope for budget restructuring in favour of BSS and the poor; and to identify strategies for improving the cost-efficiency of the delivery system of BSS. The findings and recommendations of this study were compiled in a report entitled, Public Expenditure on Basic Social Services in South Africa.46 Civil society organisations can use benchmarks and studies like these to campaign for adequate budgetary allocations to meet socio-economic rights commitments.
As the new democratic government was not yet
in existence, South Africa did not formally participate in the World Conference
on Human Rights in 1993 which adopted The Vienna Declaration and Programme
of Action. However, members of the present democratic government did attend
the Conference as special delegates.
|
for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights The Vienna Programme of Action recommended that each State consider "drawing up a national action plan identifying steps whereby that State would improve the promotion and protection of human rights."47 South Africa has responded to this call by drawing up The National Action Plan (NAP) for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights.48 This Action Plan was co-ordinated by a Steering
Committee which included representatives of the SA Human Rights Commission,
the Commission for Gender Equality, the national parliament, various government
departments and the NGO sector. The preparation and launch of the NAP involved
consultation with government departments as well as civil society organisations.
It was also accompanied by a public awareness campaign conducted via the
media, a telephone hotline and participatory workshops.
- Policy - Legislation - Administrative Steps Taken The NAP is a human rights policy document which enables government to evaluate its human rights performance, set goals and priorities within achievable time frames, devise strategies and allocate resources for the promotion and enhancement of human rights in the country. It can also be used as a tool by NGOs and the media to monitor the human rights impact of government policies, legislation and programmes. As such, the NAP provides an important basis for holding government accountable for its human rights commitments. |
6. GIVING EFFECT TO HUMAN RIGHTS -
THE ROLE OF THE STATE
"My Government's commitment to create a people-centred society of liberty binds us to the pursuit of the goals of freedom from want, freedom from hunger, freedom from deprivation, freedom from ignorance, freedom from suppression and freedom from fear. These freedoms are fundamental to the guarantee of human dignity. They will therefore constitute part of the centrepiece of what this Government will seek to achieve, the focal point on which our attention will be continuously focused. The things we have said constitute the true meaning, the justification and the purpose of the Reconstruction and Development Programme, without which it would lose all legitimacy."49
6.1 Laws, policies and programmes
Without effective policies and laws to implement
the human rights commitments in the Constitution and international instruments,
these rights will amount to little more than paper promises. A coherent
framework of laws and policies are needed to translate broad human rights
commitments into detailed and concrete programmes that have a real impact
on the lives of millions of people.
Since 1994, the democratic government in South Africa has adopted a wide range of new policies and laws. The first priority was to dismantle the discriminatory edifice of apartheid laws and to create a unified administration out of the fragmented bureaucracies that were inherited from the apartheid regime. The new policies and laws also sought to implement the Government's political commitment to a programme of reconstruction and development of South Africa society.50
Many of these laws were adopted to give effect to the rights in the Bill of Rights. Thus the Bill of Rights serves as an important impetus for the enactment of legislation and has also influenced the content of legislation. It would be misleading to assess the impact of human rights in South Africa solely, or even primarily, on the basis of court cases. More significant has been the extent to which human rights have shaped the policy and legislative context within which development must take place.
The influence of human rights can be seen in a range of legislative and policy measures adopted to give effect to the government's human rights commitments. Some illustrative examples of these measures in various sectors are provided below.
a) Labour
The Bill of Rights gives everyone the right
to fair labour practices. It protects the right of workers to form and
join trade unions and to strike, as well as the right of employers to form
and join an employer's organisation (s 23).
Key pieces of legislation that give effect to this right and other rights in the Bill of Rights in an employment context include:
A range of measures have been adopted to give effect to the constitutional right of everyone to have access to adequate housing (s 26). The following legislative and policy measures illustrate this human rights-based approach to housing:
In the area of land restitution, the major piece of legislation adopted is the Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994. This Act establishes the legal framework and mechanisms for giving effect to the constitutional right to restitution of land or equitable redress (e.g. alternative land, compensation) for persons who were dispossessed of their land after 1913 through racially discriminatory laws or practices. Claims for restitution are dealt with through two main institutions created under the Act: the Commission for Restitution of Land Rights and the Land Claims Court.
Government's land redistribution programme aims to provide the poor with land for residential and productive purposes in order to improve their livelihoods. It is intended to assist emergent farmers, the urban and rural poor, farm workers, and labour tenants. The White Paper on South African Land Policy states that redistribution projects will give priority to the marginalised and to women in need.55 The programme consists chiefly of a number of grants to assist poor individuals and groups to acquire land from willing sellers, including the State. The Settlement/Land Acquisition Grant can be used to purchase land, enhance tenure rights, and make investments in infrastructure, home improvements and farm capital. The Department of Land Affairs also provides facilitation services, as well as training and capacity-building programmes aimed at assisting grant applicants to participate effectively in the land reform programme. The Communal Property Associations Act 28 of 1996 establishes a new form of legal entity through which members of disadvantaged communities can collectively acquire, hold and manage property in terms of a written constitution. The constitution of a Communal Property Association (CPA) must be consistent with the Act: for example, it must provide equal rights for women and democratic decision-making processes.
Finally, the land tenure programme is aimed at building a unitary, non-racial system of land rights for all South Africans which is consistent with the Constitution's commitment to human rights and equality.56 To give effect to this commitment, parliament has passed the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act 3 of 1996 which protects labour tenants and their families from arbitrary evictions, and promotes their acquisition of secure land rights. Another key piece of legislation is the Extension of Security of Tenure Act 62 of 1997. This Act recognises that many people are vulnerable to unfair evictions because they do not have secure tenure of their homes and the land that they occupy. It sets out the circumstances and procedures under which evictions can take place. The courts are required to consider whether it is just and equitable to grant an eviction order, having regard to all relevant circumstances. The right of residence of certain categories of people enjoy protected status, and cannot be terminated unless they have committed a serious breach of their duties as occupiers. These people are occupiers who have lived on land belonging to the owner for 10 years and have either:
- reached the age of 60 years; ord) The Environment
- are employees or former employees of the owner or person in change, and are unable to work because of ill-health, injury or disability.57
The Act sets out 20 environmental principles
which must guide the government in relation to all activities that may
significantly affect the environment.59 These principles can assist people
in obtaining remedies in the courts or through alternative dispute resolution
mechanisms such as mediation or arbitration.
Key environmental principles:
|
e) Gender Equality
A number of laws, policies and programmes
have been adopted to promote gender equality. This is not only an important
political priority of the government, but also a key constitutional value
and right. These range from legislation providing for the lawful termination
of pregnancy (Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996), new domestic
violence legislation (Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998), the introduction
of a child support grant payable to the primary care givers of impoverished
children under the age of 7 years, and a presidential lead programme to
provide free health care at all State clinics and hospitals to pregnant
women and children under 6 years.60
The Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 is critical to the autonomy, status and proprietary rights of women married according to African customary law. Formerly these marriages were not legally recognised because they are potentially polygamous. Women in these marriages had the status of minors. This meant that they could not acquire property, enter into contracts or litigate in their own name. The Act recognises customary marriages for all purposes, thus respecting the cultural rights of persons who choose to live according to traditional systems of law. A wife in a customary marriage has, on the basis of equality with her husband, and subject to the matrimonial system governing the marriage, full status and capacity. This includes the capacity to acquire assets and to dispose of them, to enter into contracts and to litigate, in addition to any rights that she might have at customary law. Monogamous customary marriages entered into after the commencement of the Act will be deemed to be in community of property, unless the spouses exclude this proprietary regime through an ante-nuptial contract. In the case of polygamous customary marriages, the courts are required to ensure that there is an equitable distribution of property between all the parties to the marriage These provisions ensure that women in customary marriages now have an equitable share in the marital property.
f) Equality, access to information and
just administrative action
The Constitution imposes duties on the State
to enact national legislation to give effect to the right against unfair
discrimination (particularly by the private sector), the right of access
to information, and the right to just administrative action.61 In fulfilment
of these obligations, Parliament has recently passed the following important
Acts: the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination
Act 4 of 2000, the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000, and
the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000. These three statutes
have the potential to be powerful tools for civil society to challenge
discrimination, and demand transparency, accountability and participation
in development processes (see part 5.4 above).
g) Programmes to advance access to water
and health care services
A number of government departments have adopted
innovative programmes that integrate human rights values in their efforts
to expand access to basic social services.
In 1994, an estimated 12 - 14 million people in South Africa did not have access to safe water, and over 20 million were without adequate sanitation.62 Water policy and legislation are based on the notion that access to water is a basic human right, and seek actively to promote the values enshrined in the Bill of Rights.63 This approach is evident in the two major water laws, the Water Services Act 108 of 1997 and the National Water Act 36 of 1998.
The Department of Water Affairs and Forestry runs a Community Water Supply and Sanitation Programme (CWSS) which aims to provide disadvantaged communities with access to a basic water supply "by means of an integrated and sustainable people-driven programme."64 This includes providing job opportunities and developing the skills and capacity of disadvantaged communities. The BOTT Project (Build, Operate, Train and Transfer) consists of partnerships with private sector implementing agencies to build the necessary infrastructure for the programme. It incorporates a community empowerment element involving the use of local labour, training and capacity-building.
Another innovative programme is the Working
for Water Programme (WWP).
|
This programme uses labour-intensive methods
to clear invasive, alien vegetation. One of its main elements is a public
works employment programme. It thus seeks to achieve the objectives of
conserving water resources and rehabilitating degraded land through contributing
to poverty reduction. The programme's employment policy targets women,
youth and disabled people. One of its aims is to build the capacity of
organised community groups through entering into contracts, where possible,
with community development trusts and co-operatives.
|
A human rights approach to the provision of
health care services was recently endorsed by the adoption of a National
Patients' Rights Charter by the Ministry of Health.
|
On 2 November 1999, the Minister of Health, Dr. Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, launched the above Charter as "a common standard" for achieving the realisation of the right of access to health care services enshrined in section 27 of the Constitution. In her speech the Minister encouraged patients and health workers to view the Charter "as a tool to assist in changing our health system into a caring and compassionate health care delivery system."65 The patients' rights recognised in the Charter include: participation in health decision-making; access to health care services; the right to information, confidentiality, privacy and informed consent; the right to complain about health services, to have those complaints properly investigated, and to receive a full response. It also sets out the "responsibilities of the patient" which include the duty to take care of his or her health, to respect the rights of other patients and health care providers, and to comply with prescribed treatment and/or rehabilitation procedures. The Charter provides an officially sanctioned baseline standard against which to monitor and evaluate all health programmes in the health sector. It can be used as a tool of accountability by patients, health workers, broader civil society and institutions such as the South African Human Rights Commission. The National Patients' Rights Charter adopted by government was preceded by an NGO campaign entitled "Health Rights are Human Rights" run by the National Progressive Primary Health Care Network (NPPHC). This campaign involved promoting awareness of health rights and seeking the views of the public on the contents of a Health Rights Charter. It culminated in the adoption of the South African Health Rights Charter in 1997.66 |
6.2 The challenges of implementation
Despite the positive legislative framework described above, there are large backlogs in a number of social sectors. For example, the 1996 census found that less than half the households in the country (45%) have a tap inside their dwelling.67 The unemployment rate is also high at 34% for the country as a whole. It is particularly high for African women (52%) and African men (34%) compared to 4.6% for the white population group.68 There is a large gap between the rights enshrined in the new Constitution and laws, and the daily realities of people's lives. It is a key challenge of the new government and all sectors of society to close this gap.
The factors that impede the realisation of these rights and human development are complex and varied. They include:
The government is in the process of enacting legislation that will provide a unified framework for the effective functioning of local government. This draft legislation, the Municipal Systems Bill, requires municipalities to conduct their affairs in accordance with the principle of participatory governance. Public accountability and participation are considered essential for the long-term sustainability of municipalities. The Bill obliges councils to promote development and to move progressively towards ensuring universal access to quality services that are affordable to all. A system of municipal planning is instituted through the tool of Integrated Development Plans (IDPs). These plans must identify developmental objectives and priorities, the activities and resources to achieve these resources and specify time frames. This Bill, together with other legislation,72 creates an enabling framework for local government in South Africa which is geared towards more effective service delivery and participatory developmental processes. Building the capacity of local government and putting these principles into effect are essential to meeting the challenge of making human rights real in the lives of ordinary people in South Africa.
7. THE ROLE OF HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS
AND THE COURTS
7.1 Human rights institutions
The Constitution requires the establishment
of a number of independent institutions described as "State institutions
supporting constitutional democracy".73 These include the Public Protector,
Human Rights Commission, Commission for Gender Equality, and Commission
for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and
Linguistic Communities.74
The South African Human Rights Commission and the Commission for Gender Equality are particularly relevant to the promotion and protection of human rights in South Africa. They have powers to monitor, investigate, receive complaints from the public, research, educate, make recommendations and report on human rights and issues concerning gender equality.75
These Commissions play an important role in protecting and promoting human rights in South Africa, particularly through the following activities:
|
social and economic rights Each year, the Commission must require relevant organs of state to provide it with "information on the measures that they have taken towards the realisation of the rights in the Bill of Rights concerning housing, health care, food, water, social security, education and the environment." 76 Over the period 1997 - 1998, the Commission conducted its first annual cycle of requesting information from relevant organs of State in terms of this provision. The protocols (questionnaires) distributed to organs of State were designed at to solicit baseline information on the following:
"While there is a sense that developments are taking place, it is patchy, poorly co-ordinated, and it does not seem to reach the most needy groups equally. Rural areas and informal settlements are particularly disadvantaged in this respect." 77Another key finding was that "knowledge of the socio-economic clauses in the Bill of Rights as rights, rather than demands to be advanced and met in the political process, is poorly spread." This indicated a need for an information dissemination campaign to educate the public (especially disadvantaged communities) about their rights, and about the mechanisms to access them. A series of campaigns focusing on the various economic and social rights in the Constitution could "be an effective course of action to popularise notions of rights, apply pressure on government to realise them, and educate people on how to claim them." 78 In March 1999, the Commission tabled a report in Parliament on the outcome of the first monitoring cycle. This report evaluated the responses received from the various organs of State and made recommendations relating to the realisation of economic and social rights. It also made recommendations concerning the duty of organs of state within the national, provincial and local spheres of government to report to the Commission. The Commission made the following important observation on the reporting process: "Many organs of state linked the realisation of socio-economic rights to the achievement of sustained economic development in the regions. However, we must note that although economic growth may facilitate the progressive realisation of socio-economic rights, it does not automatically guarantee their realisation. All relevant organs of State have an obligation to adopt a clear plan of action combined with deliberate strategies for improving and advancing access to these rights for everyone under their jurisdiction. Also, the provincial governments should review their progress in an on-going and systematic fashion and should adopt appropriate measures to remove obstacles that prevent the fulfilment of these rights."79As part of this report, the Commission also tabled the study on public perceptions and the report entitled, Poverty and Human Rights, on the National Speak Out on Poverty Hearings (see part 8.1 below).80 The Commission has recently completed its second annual monitoring cycle. There is a greater focus on the outcomes of the measures adopted by the various organs of state in the questionnaires distributed to them. This will assist the Commission to assess the effectiveness of these measures more accurately. The monitoring process provides a valuable opportunity for the Commission to develop concrete benchmarks that can be used in assessing whether the State is fulfilling its obligations in relation to economic and social rights. Finally, although the Commission has worked closely with a number of NGO partners in the monitoring process, there is scope for broadening public participation in the process. In particular, the Commission needs to develop creative methods for involving disadvantaged communities in setting benchmarks for the progressive realisation of economic and social rights, and evaluating the impact of policies, legislation and programmes. |
7.2 The Courts
The courts have an important role to play
in providing redress for violations of human rights. The Constitution has
created a number of different courts, including Magistrates' Courts, High
Courts the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional
Court is the highest court for deciding constitutional matters.
The Bill of Rights confers legal standing on a wide range of persons to approach a court for appropriate relief when human rights are infringed or threatened. These include anyone acting on behalf of other persons who cannot act in their own name, anyone acting as a member of, or in the interest of, a group or class of persons, and anyone acting in the public interest.81 The courts are also given broad remedial powers in constitutional matters. When deciding a constitutional matter within its jurisdiction, a court must declare invalid any law or conduct that is inconsistent with the Constitution, and may make any order that is "just and equitable."82
As noted above, the jurisdiction of the courts to enforce human rights extends to all the rights in the Bill of Rights - civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. Thus far the Constitutional Court has delivered a number of important judgements in relation to civil and political rights, including the rights of arrested, detained and accused persons, political rights such as the right to vote, and the right to equality. For example:
Access to legal assistance for poor communities, especially in rural areas, is a major challenge. The State-funded legal aid system, based on the judicare system, is facing serious budgetary constraints. Initiatives are currently underway to reform the system, but in the meantime there is a serious lack of access to legal representation in a range of cases, including those critical to the land reform process.90
8. THE ROLES OF CIVIL SOCIETY, THE MEDIA
AND
THE PRIVATE SECTOR
8.1 Civil society advocacy and campaigns
In the new democratic era, many NGOs are
focusing on reconstruction, development and human rights. A number of innovative
campaigns involving human rights awareness, community mobilisation, advocacy
and lobbying have been conducted by NGOs in a range of fields.
Some examples include:
a) The Reproductive Rights Alliance successfully
campaigned to include a right to "make decisions concerning reproduction"
in the final Constitution and to ensure the passing of pro-choice legislation.
It is now involved in monitoring the implementation of this legislation
and promoting awareness of reproductive rights among South African communities.
91
b) Many organisations have been involved
in campaigns to highlight the prevalence and causes of violence against
women in South African society, law reform initiatives, providing counselling
and support services, and lobbying for improved policing, medical and social
services in cases of rape and domestic violence.
c) The Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) mobilises
a broad range of constituencies (e.g. the health sector, labour movement,
the religious sector, business, youth and women) - to campaign for:
The National Speak Out on Poverty Hearings
was a major campaign co-ordinated by the South African National NGO Coalition
(SANGOCO) to highlight the plight of poor people in South Africa.
|
"Together we ended apartheid, together we can end poverty" "It's time to listen to the experiences and ideas of the poor and their advocates." Between 31 March and 19 June 1998, the South African National NGO Coalition (SANGOCO), the South African Human Rights Commission and the Commission on Gender Equality jointly convened a series of 10 hearings on poverty in South Africa. The purpose of these hearings was to hear and document direct testimony from poor and disadvantaged communities on the impact of apartheid policies on their quality of life; the main obstacles they currently experience in gaining access to resources, services and opportunities; and the coping and survival strategies they employ. Each hearing was presided over by a panel of commissioners drawn from the Human Rights Commission and Gender Commission, as well as persons in leadership positions in civil society. Over 10 00 people participated by attending the hearings, mobilising communities or making submissions. Nearly 600 people presented oral evidence over the 35 days of the hearings. At the conclusion of the hearings, a statement of commitment was adopted by the partners in the process. This National Poverty Commitment recommends actions to be taken by a range of role players towards eradicating poverty. They are directed to the public, government officials, politicians, the private sector, civil society (e.g. NGOs, religious institutions, labour etc.), the media, and bodies responsible for monitoring these commitments (e.g. the SA Human Rights Commission, and the Commission for Gender Equality). SANGOCO also produced two reports on the hearings:
The People's Voices 92 and Poverty and Human Rights.93
"Many of the stories recorded showed great resourcefulness. But they also showed that resourcefulness is not enough. Many people clearly wanted to be independent...However, in a situation of extreme poverty it was difficult, if not impossible, for people to pull themselves up by their bootstraps without an enabling environment. One thing that was clear was that many people are willing to do something and the resourcefulness and energy. But they need assistance, whether in the form of jobs, resources, access to markets, training or something else. What was also clear was that one "recipe" or form of assistance will not be the solution of the problems. Assistance needs to be tailored to the particular needs of individuals and households...The opportunity to end poverty is not yet lost but the clock is ticking fast. Let us not push the poor to the point where they tear apart our hard-won democracy. Let us ensure that people enjoy freedom from poverty, as well as political freedom." 95 |
One of the vehicles for taking forward the recommendations of the Poverty Hearings is The War on Poverty Forum, a partnership between the South African National NGO Coalition (SANGOCO), the Department of Welfare, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Homeless People's Federation, the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU), and the South African Council of Churches (SACC). The Forum had drafted a National Programme of Action for the Eradication of Poverty.
The key challenge for civil society is to translate the insights and information gained through the Poverty Hearings into concrete strategies and campaigns that will make a meaningful contribution to the realisation of human rights and development for all in South Africa.
8.2 The media
The media in South Africa operates in an
environment where freedom of expression and of the press and other media
is constitutionally guaranteed. This right to freedom of expression does
not extend to: war propaganda; the incitement of imminent violence; or
advocacy of hatred that is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion,
and that constitutes incitement to cause harm.96
The media has a critical role to play in exposing human rights violations and in disseminating information and raising awareness on issues relating to human rights and development. In the National Poverty Commitment adopted after the Poverty Hearings, the media was called on "to ensure the fight against poverty becomes the nation's priority by providing regular and prime space for disseminating information about poverty eradication programmes through both print and electronic media." (see part 8.1 above). An example of such coverage is found in Reconstruct, an innovative supplement to The Sunday Independent newspaper. It provides weekly coverage of initiatives, development projects and campaigns conducted by civil society organisations.
In the context of widespread illiteracy in South Africa, community radio has a critical role to play in disseminating information to disadvantaged communities, particularly in marginalised rural areas. There are a number of community radio stations on air broadcasting on a range of issues relating to human rights and development such as HIV/AIDS, violence against women, children's rights and education and training initiatives. Government together with the National Community Radio Forum (NCRF) and the Independent Media Diversity Trust (IMDT) plans to concentrate on funding and capacity building to promote the expansion of community radio stations. 97
A key challenge is to ensure the diversification
of the media in South Africa, particularly in relation to race, gender,
disability, religion, culture and language. In the words of a recent editorial
in Reconstruct:
"Media diversity in a multicultural, multilingual
and multi-denominational South Africa forms part of the basis for the democratic
transition that began five years ago. Diversity does not only mean increasing
the range of mediums or providing a variety of mediums to a variety of
communities. It also means giving men, women, youth, the disabled and all
ethnic groups a chance to participate in the media. And it means ensuring
that their representation in newspapers and on radio and television does
not succumb to stereotypes."98
The SA Human Rights Commission is currently in the process of conducting an investigation into the handling of race and racism in the media. Part of this investigation concerns racial stereotyping in reporting. Women's organisations have also expressed concern about gender stereotyping in the media.99
8.3 The private sector
During the National Speak Out on Poverty
Hearings, there were accounts of people receiving money or other assistance
from private sector companies. However, many of the stories were also about
"how the private sector had destroyed livelihoods through retrenchments,
and through damaging the health of workers and the communities in which
their farms, mines and factories operated." There were also complaints
about a lack of responsiveness from the companies concerned to community
appeals to address these problems.100
The key recommendations addressed to the private sector in the National Poverty Commitment adopted after the Poverty Hearings were to:
The private sector clearly also has a broader responsibility to the society in which it functions. This includes adopting production methods that respect the environmental rights in the Constitution and promoting community development.
In recent years, a number of investment funds have been established in South Africa that are orientated towards social responsibility. Through socially responsible investment portfolios, pension funds can make a contribution towards growth and development in South Africa. The aim of these funds is to participate in the development of disadvantaged communities through investment in infrastructure, job creation, service provision and economic empowerment.104 The trade union movement has published its own list of socially responsible companies as part of its Community Growth Fund, a union-run unit trust that invests only in companies that meet its criteria. These criteria include job creation through innovation and expansion plans, worker training and skills development, equity through affirmative action, the promotion of sound environmental practices, and open and effective corporate governance. A recent survey estimated that businesses in South Africa spent more than R4 billion (the approximate size of the budget of a medium sized government department in 1997/8) on total corporate social investment in 1997/1998.105
Corporations are also demonstrating an awareness that corporate responsibility is not just about charity or cash hand-outs, but about investing responsibly in sustainable community development projects. Projects range from sponsoring mobile health clinics, the building and improvement of schools, early childhood development, housing programmes, educational initiatives, AIDS awareness and education, arts and culture, facilitating access to development finance and credit, and supporting emerging small and medium enterprises. The Mail and Guardian newspaper together the South African Grantmakers' Association recognises innovative corporate social investments through its annual Investing in the Future Awards. The intention of these awards is to further ethical and professional practice in corporate funding and investments. Key elements in judging these awards are the sustainability of projects and how stakeholders from the government, the communities involved, businesses and other organisations work together.106
One of the issues that corporate responsibility
managers face is drawing a distinction between the role of government and
the role of the private sector in development initiatives. It is clearly
not sustainable nor desirable for the private sector to take over the responsibilities
of government in the provision of basic social services. However, the private
sector has an important role to play in supplementing the work of government,
and contributing to the development process. The social investment manager
of a major corporate group in South Africa describes their current philosophy
on corporate responsibility in the following terms:
"Development of society can be compared to
a duck's foot. The government provides the bones, but business and NGOs
provide the webbing. Without the webbing, the duck can't swim." 107
9. CONCLUSION
Democracy and the new Constitution have provided a framework of values and institutions for the protection and advancement of human rights and development in South Africa. The South African Constitution endorses a holistic vision of human rights which includes civil and political as well as economic, social and cultural rights.
A range of policy and legislative measures have been taken to translate constitutional rights and values into concrete programmes. A number of independent institutions have been established to monitor the implementation of human rights commitments, to assist the victims of human rights violations to obtain redress, and to promote human rights awareness. Organisations of civil society are playing an important role in highlighting and responding to the human rights and developmental issues faced on a daily basis by disadvantaged communities.
The new order of constitutional democracy has represented a bridge away from the culture of authority to a culture of justification - "a culture in which every exercise of power is expected to be justified; in which the leadership given by government rests on the cogency of the case offered in defence of its decisions, not the fear inspired by the force of its command."108 At the same time, it commits the State and all sectors of society to overcoming the political, economic and social subordination and exclusion of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged groups in our society.
While a good start has been made, there is still much hard work to be done before this commitment is fulfilled. The wide gap between the constitutional promises and the lived realities of millions of poor South Africans remains a constant challenge. The Constitution and new laws have provided the government and society as a whole with a number of effective tools with which to meet the challenge. Each sector of society has an important role to play, and must use these tools in a concerted effort to create a better life for all.
1. Note on the use of racial terminology in
this paper:
In the apartheid era, all South Africans
were classified in one of four population (race) groups - African, Coloured,
Indian and White. The current government rejects these racist classifications,
but is committed to collecting statistics on a racial basis so as to measure
how far it has moved in countering the historical effects of apartheid.
This paper also refers to these racial groups to reflect the relative levels
of disadvantage they experienced under apartheid and its on-going legacy
of poverty and inequality. African people were most disadvantaged and the
white group most privileged. The generic term, 'black people' in this paper
refers to the African, Coloured and Indian population groups.
2. Note on the use of boxes in this paper
The use of boxes in this paper is intended
to highlight interesting cases and innovations in the area of human rights
and development in South Africa.
3. References
A full reference to all sources relied on
in this paper are contained in the footnotes.
1 This was affirmed by the World
Conference on Human Rights in The Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action,
June 1993, UN doc. A/Conf 157/23, Part I, para. 5.
2 See General Comment No. 3
(Fifth session, 1990), UN doc. E/1991/23, The nature of States parties
obligations (art 2(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights) adopted by UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights, paras. 10 - 12.
3 Ex parte Chairperson of the
Constitutional Assembly: In re Certification of the Constitution of the
Republic of South Africa, 1996 1996 (4) SA 744 (CC), 1996 (10) Butterworths
Constitutional Law Reports (BCLR) 1253 (CC), para. 7.
4 Human Rights and the South
African Legal Order, Princeton University Press, 1978, p. 73.
5 The year of the June, 16th
student uprising which started in Soweto.
6 White Paper on South African
Land Policy, Department of Land Affairs, Government of South Africa, April
1997, p. 11.
7 John Dugard, Human Rights
and the South African Legal Order, Princeton University Press, 1978, p.
84.
8 H. Bhorat, 'The South African
social safety net: past, present and future', vol. 12, No. 4 Development
Southern Africa, 1995 note 4, p. 598.
9 The Prohibition of Mixed
Marriages Act of 1949, and the Immorality Act of 1957
10 See Thandabantu Nlapo, 'Indigenous
Law and Gender in South Africa: Taking Human Rights and Cultural Diversity
Seriously.' Third World Legal Studies, published by the International Third
World Legal Studies Association and The Valparaiso University School of
Law, 1994 - 5, pp. 49 - 71.
11 Poverty and Inequality in
South Africa, Report prepared for the Office of the Executive Deputy President
and the Inter-Ministerial Committee for Poverty and Inequality, Summary
Report, edited by Julian May, 13 May 1998, p. 8.
12 Key Indicators of Poverty
in South Africa, An analysis prepared for the Office of the Reconstruction
and Development Programme (RDP) by the World Bank, based on the South Africa
Living Standards and Development Survey, coordinated by the Southern Africa
Labour and Development Research Unit (SALDRU) at the University of Cape
Town, Ministry in the Office of the President: Reconstruction and Development
Programme, October 1995, p. 4
13 Ibid., p. 6.
14 Poverty and Inequality in
South Africa, supra, p. 61.
15 Postamble on National Unity
and Reconciliation, Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200
of 1993.
16 Constitution of the Republic
of South Africa Act 200 of 1993.
17 Chapter 3.
18 Schedule 4.
19 Initially the Constitutional
Court declined to certify the final Constitution. It was only certified
after certain amendments to the text: first certification judgment: Ex
parte Chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly: In re Certification of
the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 1996 (4) SA 744
(CC), 1996 (10) BCLR 1253 (CC); second certification judgment: Ex parte
Chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly: In re Certification of the
Amended Text of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
1997 (2) SA 97 (CC), 1997 (1) BCLR 1 (CC).
20 The Constitution of the
Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996 [hereafter referred to as the
final Constitution or the 1996 Constitution].
21 One of the slogans used
in the advertising campaigns which formed part of the public participation
programme.
22 Quoted in: Hassen Ebrahim,
The Soul of a Nation: Constitution-making in South Africa, Oxford University
Press: Cape Town, 1998, p. 239.
23 Hassen Ebrahim, The Soul
of a Nation: Constitution-making in South Africa, Oxford University Press:
Cape Town, 1998, p. 242. For a full account of the public participation
process, see chapter 13.
24 Section 7(1).
25 Examples include Namibia,
Ireland, and India. However, in Indian constitutional law these directive
principles have exerted a far-reaching influence on the interpretation
of the civil and political rights ("fundamental rights") protected in the
Constitution, particularly the right to life: see B. P. Jeewan Reddy &
Rajeev Dhavan, 'The Jurisprudence of Human Rights' in D. M. Beatty (ed)
Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective, Martinus Nijhoff
Publishers: Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1994, pp. 175 - 226.
26 See General Comment No.
3 (Fifth session, 1990), UN doc. E/1991/23, The nature of States parties
obligations (art 2(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights) adopted by UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights.
27 Postamble of the interim
Constitution. These provisions were carried forward to final Constitution
in item 22, schedule 6.
28 Section 3(1) of the Promotion
of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995.
29 Section 1(ix) of the Promotion
of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995.
30 Section 4(a) of the Promotion
of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995.
31 Submission to the Truth
and Reconciliation Commission Concerning the Relevance of Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights to the Commission's Mandate, submitted by: Community
Law Centre, Development Action Group, Legal Resources Centre, Black Sash,
National NGO Coalition, National Land Committee, National Literacy Cooperative,
Peoples' Dialogue, Urban Sector Network, and Centre for Human Rights, 18
March 1997.
32 Truth and Reconciliation
Commission of South Africa Report, Volumes 1 - 5, distributed for the Truth
and Reconciliation Commission by Juta & Co Ltd, Cape Town, October
1998.
33 Final Report, Vol. 4, Chapter
2 ('Institutional Hearings: Business and Labour'), paras. 161 - 167; and
Final Report, Vol. 5, Chapter 6 ('Findings and Conclusions'), para. 156.
For a full account of these hearings, see: Beth S. Lyons, 'Getting to Accountability:
Business, Apartheid and Human Rights' vol. 17, no. 2, Netherlands Quarterly
of Human Rights (June, 1999), pp. 135 - 160.
34 The Constitutional Assembly
(CA) was bound by the constitutional principle which required it to protect
"all universally accepted fundamental rights, freedoms and civil liberties",
by entrenched and justiciable provisions in the final Constitution (Constitutional
Principle II, Schedule 4). The Technical Committee advising the CA on the
Bill of Rights prepared comprehensive memoranda on the protection of civil,
political, economic, social and cultural rights in international human
rights treaties and instruments as well as in other national legal systems.
35 The interests of these groups
were represented by parties such as the National Party and The Freedom
Front.
36 S v Makwanyane & another
1995 (3) SA 391 (CC), 1995 (6) BCLR 665 (CC) at para. 35. This pronouncement
was in respect of the equivalent provision in the interim Constitution.
37 S v Makwanyane & another
1995 (3) SA 391 (CC), 1995 (6) BCLR 665 (CC).
38 S v Williams 1995 (3) SA
632 (CC), 1995 (7) BCLR 861 (CC).
39 Ex parte Gauteng Provincial
Legislature: In re Dispute Concerning the Constitutionality of Certain
Provisions of the Gauteng School Education Bill of 1995 1996 (3) SA 165
(CC), 1996 (4) BCLR 537 (CC). See particularly the concurring judgment
of Sachs J.
40 NGO Shadow Report to CEDAW
South Africa: Violence Against Women, 1998, co-ordinated by the Masimanyane
Women's Support Centre in East London with the participation of a number
of other NGOs, 1998.
41 Prepared by The National
Children's Rights Committee (NCRC).
42 In other words, the Constitution
endorses a dualist system with regard to the domestic effect of international
treaties. An exception is made for a self-executing provision of an agreement
that has been approved by Parliament which becomes law in the country unless
inconsistent with the Constitution or an Act of Parliament (s 231(4)).
Customary international law also automatically becomes law in the country
unless it is inconsistent with the Constitution or an Act of Parliament
(s 232).
43 This is explicitly stated
to be one of the objects of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of
Unfair Discrimination Act: see s 2(h).
44 Parliamentary Committee
on the Improvement of the Quality of Life and Status of Women, Report on
Government's Implementation of CEDAW and the Beijing Platform for Action,
November 1998.
45 Chapter 5, para. 88c.
46 Financial and Fiscal Commission,
Public Expenditure on Basic Social Services in South Africa, An FFC Report
for UNICEF and UNDP, 1998. The study found that South Africa spends approximately
14% of its budget on pre-primary and primary education and primary health
care. However, if a wider definition of BSS is used (e.g. including spending
on social welfare and public works), expenditure exceeds the 20% target.
47 The Vienna Declaration and
Programme of Action, June 1993, UN doc. A/Conf 157/23, Part II, para. 71.
48 The National Action Plan
for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, December 1998, Republic
of South Africa.
49 Former State President of
South Africa, Mr. Nelson Mandela in his Inaugural Address to a Joint Sitting
of Parliament, 24 May 1994.
50 Government's strategy for
the fundamental transformation of society is set out in the White Paper
on Reconstruction and Development, Republic of South Africa, September
1994.
51 The People of South Africa
Population Census, 1996, Census in Brief, Report No: 03-01-11(1996), published
by Statistics South Africa, 1998, p. 37 and p. 41.
52 Para. 4.4.2.
53 Section 4.
54 'Socio-Economic Rights in
South Africa: Facing the challenges of implementation' vol. 1, no. 4, March
1999, ESR Review, a quarterly publication by the Community Law Centre (University
of the Western Cape) and the Centre for Human Rights (University of Pretoria),
p. 15.
55 White Paper on South African
Land Policy, Department of Land Affairs, April 1997, p 45.
56 White Paper on South African
Land Policy, Department of Land Affairs, April 1997, xii.
57 Section 8(4).
58 Government has produced
the following user-friendly guide to the National Environmental Mangagement
Act (NEMA): A User Guide to the National Environmental Management Act,
Guide 1: Your right to take action to prevent environmental damage in terms
of NEMA, written by Angela Andrews, Legal Resources Centre, published by
the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, 1999.
59 Section 2.
60 A useful resource on women's
rights in South Africa is: Making Women's Rights Real, a resource manual
on women, gender, human rights and the law, published by the Gender Manual
Consortium, first edition, June 1999.
61 Sections 9(4), 32 and 33
read with item 23, Schedule 6 of the 1996 Constitution.
62 White Paper on Water Policy,
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, April 1997, para. 2.2.3.
63 This approach is evident
in the two major water laws, the Water Services Act 108 of 1997 and the
National Water Act 36 of 1998.
64 Department of Water Affairs
and Forestry, RDP 4 Business Plan, 1997.
65 Speech of the Minister of
Health, Dr. Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, at the launch of the National Patients'
Rights Charter at the Etwatwa Community Health Centre, Benoni on 2 November
1999.
66 The South African Health
Rights Charter: Your Passport to Health Rights, National Progressive Primary
Health Care Network (NPPHC).
67 The People of South Africa
Population Census, 1996, Census in Brief, Report No: 03-01-11(1996), published
by Statistics South Africa, 1998, p. 77.
68 Ibid., pp. 46 - 47.
69 'Budget constraints halt
plans', Business Day, 14 September 1999.
70 Between 1994 and 1996, the
number of reported rapes per 100 000 of the population increased from 105,3
to 119, 5. This method of reporting underestimates the danger to individual
women and girls in that the male population is far less likely to be raped
and, in terms of the legal definition used for these statistics, cannot
be raped. Even with increased reporting, the majority of rapes go unreported:
see Women and Men in South Africa, written by Debbie Budlender, published
by Central Statistics, Pretoria, 1998, figure 36.
71 'Sharpening Budget Reform:
for the effective implementation of the RDP', Congress of South African
Trade Unions, 1997, unpublished paper presented to the ANC Policy Conference
in November 1998.
72 The Municipal Demarcation
Act 27 of 1998 and the Municipal Structures Act 117 of 1998.
73 Chapter 9 of the 1996 Constitution.
74 At the date of writing all
these institutions, with the exception of the Commission for the Promotion
and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities,
have been established and are operational.
75 Details concerning the composition,
powers and functions of these institutions are set out in the Human Right
Commission Act 54 of 1994 and the Commission on Gender Equality Act 39
of 1996.
76 Section 184(3) of the 1996
Constitution.
77 Community Agency for Social
Enquiry (CASE), Economic and Social Rights: CASE Report, Volume VI of the
Report of the SA Human Rights Commission to Parliament, 1999, vii.
78 Ibid.
79 South African Human Rights
Commission, Economic and Social Rights Report: Baseline Information: 1997
- 1998, Volume I, 1999, p. 79.
80 South African National NGO
Coalition (SANGOCO)'s Report on Poverty and Human Rights, Volume V of the
Report of the SA Human Rights Commission to Parliament, 1999.
81 Section 38 of the 1996 Constitution.
82 Section 172(1) of the 1996
Constitution.
83 S v Makwanyane & another
1995 (3) SA 391 (CC), 1995 (6) BCLR 665 (CC).
84 S v Williams 1995 (3) SA
632 (CC), 1995 (7) BCLR 861 (CC).
85 August and Another v Electoral
Commission and others 1999(4) BCLR 363 (CC).
86 National Coalition for Gay
and Lesbian Equality and the South African Human Rights Commission v The
Minister of Justice and others 1998 (12) BCLR 1517 (CC).
87 Soobramoney v Minister of
Health, KwaZulu-Natal 1997 (12) BCLR 1696 (CC). Also see the article by
Constitutional Court judge, Justice Kate O'Regan, 'Introducing Socio-Economic
Rights' vol. 1, no. 4, March 1999, ESR Review a quarterly publication by
the Community Law Centre (University of the Western Cape) and the Centre
for Human Rights (University of Pretoria), p. 2.
88 See, for example: Ross v
South Peninsula Municipality High Court (Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division),
Case No. A 741/98 (3 September 1999), unreported at the date of writing;
Cape Killarney Property Investments (Pty) Ltd v F Mahamba & 2nd to
543rd Respondents, High Court (Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division),
Case No. 7318/99 (1 October 99), unreported at the date of writing.
89 Grootboom and others v Oostenberg
Municipality and others (all three levels of government - national, provincial
and local - were cited as co-respondents) 2000 (3) BCLR 277 (C). In terms
of s 28(1)(c) every child has the right "to basic nutrition, shelter, basic
health care services and social services."
90 Mbongeni Zondi, 'New legal
aid tariffs leave the poor in the lurch', Reconstruct, supplement to the
Sunday Independent newspaper, 14 November 1999.
91 Section 12(2) of the 1996
Constitution; The Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996.
92 The People's Voices, National
Speak Out on Poverty Hearings, March-June 1998, written and compiled by
Debbie Budlender, Community Agency for Social Enquiry (CASE), produced
by the South African NGO Coalition (SANGOCO), July 1998.
93 Poverty and Human Rights,
National Speak Out on Poverty Hearings, March-June 1998, written and compiled
by Sandra Liebenberg and Karrisha Pillay, Socio-Economic Rights Project,
Community Law Centre (University of the Western Cape), produced by the
South African NGO Coalition (SANGOCO), July 1998.
94 Poverty and Human Rights,
supra, pp. 45 - 47.
95 The People's Voices, supra,
pp. 86 - 87.
96 Section 16 of the 1996 Constitution.
97 Caroline Hooper-Box, 'Community
radio set to play more of a role', Reconstruct supplement to The Sunday
Independent newspaper, 31 October 1999, p.1.
98 Editorial, 'Participation
is also part of media diversity' Reconstruct supplement to The Sunday Independent
newspaper, 31 October 1999, p. 6.
99 Sue Howell, 'Research finds
that media coverage of rape is stereotypical, with women portrayed as victims,
not survivors, in sensationalist reporting' Reconstruct supplement to The
Sunday Independent newspaper, 31 October 1999, pp. 6 - 7.
100 The People's Voices, National
Speak Out on Poverty Hearings, March-June 1998, written and compiled by
Debbie Budlender, Community Agency for Social Enquiry (CASE), produced
by the South African NGO Coalition (SANGOCO), July 1998, p. 83.
101 Ibid., p. 85.
102 12% of African people who
are employed fall into the occupational categories of legislators, senior
officials, managers, professionals and technicians as compared to 41% of
the white population group: The People of South Africa Population Census,
1996, Census in Brief, Report No: 03-01-11(1996), published by Statistics
South Africa, 1998, p. 52. Many of the African people in these categories
are at management level in the public sector, rather than the private sector.
103 L. Schlemmer, 'Corporate
Business in a Wider Role: Brief results of two CDE (Centre for Development
and Enterprise) surveys on resource flows from business to society in South
Africa' No. 4, CDE Focus, June 1999, pp. 2 - 4.
104 Simon Segal, 'Investing
in upliftment', Investing in the Future: Special focus on corporate social
responsibility, supplement to the Mail & Guardian newspaper, 27 March
to 2 April 1998, p. 4.
105 L. Schlemmer, 'Corporate
Business in a Wider Role: Brief results of two CDE (Centre for Development
and Enterprise) surveys on resource flows from business to society in South
Africa' No. 4, CDE Focus, June 1999, pp. 4 - 6.
106 Mail & Guardian reporter,
'10 years of investment' Investing in the Future, supplement to the Mail
& Guardian newspaper, 27 August to 2 September 1999, p. 3.
107 Margie Keeton of Tshikululu
Social Investments quoted in an article by Ann Eveleth, 'A return on social
investment' Investing in the Future, supplement to the Mail & Guardian
newspaper, 3 to 11 March 1999, p. 10.
108 Etienne Mureinik, 'A bridge
to where? Introducing the interim Bill of Rights' vol. 10, part I, South
African Journal on Human Rights (1994), pp. 31 - 48 at p. 32.