Highlight

2009 Global NHDR Teams Meeting
Learn more

HD Awards 2009
2009 logo tiny
Learn more

Kosovo 2002

National/Regional HDR CORPORATE POLICY REVIEW SCORECARD Score Card Weight KOSOVO
2002
CORPORATE POLICY PRINCIPLES   Yes No N/A
1 PROCESS - National ownership
1.1 Participatory selection for strategically choosing the theme      
1.2 Relevance of theme as a national priority and national recognition and commitment      
1.3 Linkage to national Development Plans and policies      
1.4 Report draws on national expertise and capacities      
1.5 Process contributes to national credibility and ownership of the HDR      
1.6 Analysis of HDR Is considered within the regional and global context      
summary of findings for principle 1 - National ownership2 11% 100%
2 PROCESS - Participatory and inclusive preparation
2.1 Team is multidisciplinary (political scientists, economists, etc.)      
2.2 Team is broadbased (government, non-government, etc.)      
2.3 Participatory mechanisms at various stages (I.e., steering committee, Advisory Committee, national/regional HDR Team and Reader Groups)      
2.4 Peer review conducted      
2.5 Clear and accurate identification of target readership      
2.6 Explanation of process in Annex or preface      
summary of findings for principle 2 - Participatory and inclusive preparation 11% 100%
3 PROCESS - Independence of analysis
3.1 Editorial ownership belongs to its authors      
3.2 Report presents a spectrum of viewpoints and perspectives      
3.3 Report's authors chosen by UNDP/national partners through process of dialogue      
3.4 Established broad based Steering committee represented by authors, advisory committee members, key partners, government and sponsors      
3.5 Objective analysis that avoids supporting the policies or politics of any one group or institution      
summary of findings for principle 3 - Independence of Analysis 11% 100%
4 PRODUCT - Quality of analysis
4.1 Ensure the report has been peer reviewed at full draft stage      
4.2 Purpose and Coherence
4.2.1 Choice of theme is strategic and timely within national context      
4.2.2 The report is part of an ongoing and regular HDR publication series      
4.2.3 Logical overall structure      
4.2.4 Synergy between analysis and data      
4.2.5 Balance between descriptive information and analysis      
4.3 HD analysis
4.3.1 Clear overview of human development (theory within national context)      
4.3.2 Theme(s) analyzed from human development perspective      
4.3.3 Analysis monitors human development progress in the country      
4.3.4 Assessment of the impact of past HDRs      
4.3.5 People's perceptions are articulated in the HDR      
4.4 Policy Analysis and Recommendations
4.4.1 Critical evaluation of relevant, existing policies.      
4.4.2 Analysis of policy alternatives are presented      
4.4.3 Policy recommendations are clear, concrete, realistic      
4.4.4 Policy recommendations identify specific steps, institutions and actors required for implementation      
4.5 HDI and Other Indexes
4.5.1 Human Development Index calculated      
4.5.2 HPI/GEM/GDI included      
4.5.3 New indicators developed or innovations made to existing HD indexes      
4.5.4 Methodology has been adjusted to reflect national context      
4.6 Data
4.6.1 Variety of sources (govt, donors, NGOs)      
4.6.2 Quantitative and qualitative: surveys, public opinion, case studies, etc. specifically for the report      
4.6.3 Data is clearly sourced within the report      
4.6.4 Human development data used in the report text or annexes is disaggregated by gender, ethnicity, region to capture disparities      
4.6.5 Trends over time      
4.6.6 Comparisons with other countries      
4.7 Annexes
4.7.1 Glossary of HD terms, technical notes on indices and indicators defined in user friendly ways      
4.7.2 Statistical annex with key HD indicators      
4.7.3 Bibliography      
4.7.4 Description on the report's preparation process and methodology      
summary of findings for principle 4 - Quality of Analysis 25% 84%
5 PRODUCT - Flexibility and creativity in presentation
5.1 Clear and user-friendly language      
5.2 Cogent groupings of major and ancillary recommendations      
5.3 Cogent overview or executive summary      
5.4 Meaningful and attractive cover that clearly states country, date and theme of report      
5.5 Accessible, varied presentation: tables, graphs, figures, charts, maps and pictures      
5.6 Text boxes highliighting People's voices and experiences included      
5.7 Year on cover reflects year HDR was launched      
5.8 Report published in national language(s)      
5.9 Details on how to receive copies of the HDR      
summary of findings for principle 5 - Flexibility and creativity in presentation 8% 100%
6 ADVOCACY - Sustained follow up
6.1 Dissemination and launch
6.1.1 Advocacy, dissemination strategies for target audiences expressed in the report      
6.1.2 Use of media (TV, radio, Print) (even after launch)      
6.1.3 Innovative products used (web site, CD rom, charts, posters, press releases, pamphlets)      
6.1.4 Visible launch: government, NGO, UNDP, donors, educational centers, policy / think tanks.      
6.1.5 Wide distribution and/or sale of reports (especially local and national)      
6.1.6 Seminars/debates for targeted audiences      
6.1.7 Post the HDR online by launch date      
6.2 Monitoring and Impact Evaluation
6.2.1 Monitoring of policy impact: change in legislation, budget allocation, programmes etc.      
6.2.2 HDR analysis contributes to activities of UN and UNDP      
6.2.3 Review of users and uses of HDR: demand      
6.2.4 Strategies for use of the findings in the country's formal and informal education system      
summary of findings for principle 6 - Sustained Follow-up 33% 95%
Consolidated Results 100% 94%

Return to the list <<<<<