Copy and paste the code below, or use the file export link (if available for that format).

@article{
  author = {Development Initiatives},
  title = {Development Assistance for Water and Sanitation},
  journal = {UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)},
  year = {2006},
  location = {New York},
  URL = {},
  abstract = {When assessing the priority that donors attach to water and sanitation, it is necessary not only to look at what has happened to water and sanitation spending in volume terms, but also how the sector has fared within the wider context of the trend in global aid as a share of total ODA. This means looking first at the overall picture on aid flows. Following a gradual rise in real terms over the 1970s and 1980s to reach a high watermark of $62.4 billions in 1992, a sharp decline in overseas aid disbursements occurred over the following 5 years. By 1997, global aid had fallen back to $48.5 billions – in real terms (2003 prices) the fall in aid was from $68089 millions to $52451 millions, a decline of 22%.}
}

AU - Development Initiatives
TI - Development Assistance for Water and Sanitation
PT - Journal Article
DP - 2006
TA - UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)
AB - When assessing the priority that donors attach to water and sanitation, it is necessary not only to look at what has happened to water and sanitation spending in volume terms, but also how the sector has fared within the wider context of the trend in global aid as a share of total ODA. This means looking first at the overall picture on aid flows. Following a gradual rise in real terms over the 1970s and 1980s to reach a high watermark of $62.4 billions in 1992, a sharp decline in overseas aid disbursements occurred over the following 5 years. By 1997, global aid had fallen back to $48.5 billions – in real terms (2003 prices) the fall in aid was from $68089 millions to $52451 millions, a decline of 22%.

%0 Journal Article
%A Development Initiatives
%T Development Assistance for Water and Sanitation
%D 2006
%J UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)
%U ,
%X When assessing the priority that donors attach to water and sanitation, it is necessary not only to look at what has happened to water and sanitation spending in volume terms, but also how the sector has fared within the wider context of the trend in global aid as a share of total ODA. This means looking first at the overall picture on aid flows. Following a gradual rise in real terms over the 1970s and 1980s to reach a high watermark of $62.4 billions in 1992, a sharp decline in overseas aid disbursements occurred over the following 5 years. By 1997, global aid had fallen back to $48.5 billions – in real terms (2003 prices) the fall in aid was from $68089 millions to $52451 millions, a decline of 22%.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Development Initiatives
TI  - Development Assistance for Water and Sanitation
PY  - 2006
JF  - UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)
UR  - ,
AB  - When assessing the priority that donors attach to water and sanitation, it is necessary not only to look at what has happened to water and sanitation spending in volume terms, but also how the sector has fared within the wider context of the trend in global aid as a share of total ODA. This means looking first at the overall picture on aid flows. Following a gradual rise in real terms over the 1970s and 1980s to reach a high watermark of $62.4 billions in 1992, a sharp decline in overseas aid disbursements occurred over the following 5 years. By 1997, global aid had fallen back to $48.5 billions – in real terms (2003 prices) the fall in aid was from $68089 millions to $52451 millions, a decline of 22%.

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Development Assistance for Water and Sanitation
AU  - Development Initiatives
PY  - 2006
JF  - UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)
UR  - ,
AB  - When assessing the priority that donors attach to water and sanitation, it is necessary not only to look at what has happened to water and sanitation spending in volume terms, but also how the sector has fared within the wider context of the trend in global aid as a share of total ODA. This means looking first at the overall picture on aid flows. Following a gradual rise in real terms over the 1970s and 1980s to reach a high watermark of $62.4 billions in 1992, a sharp decline in overseas aid disbursements occurred over the following 5 years. By 1997, global aid had fallen back to $48.5 billions – in real terms (2003 prices) the fall in aid was from $68089 millions to $52451 millions, a decline of 22%.