MPI 2024 FAQs

The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) identifies multiple deprivations at the household and individual level in health, education and standard of living, the same three dimensions as the Human Development Index. It uses micro data from household surveys, and—unlike the Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index— all the indicators needed to construct the measure must come from the same survey. Each person in a given household is classified as multidimensionally poor or non-poor depending on the weighted number of deprivations his or her household, and thus, he or she experiences. These data are then aggregated into the national measure of multidimensional poverty. The MPI reflects both the incidence of multidimensional deprivation (a headcount of those in multidimensional poverty) and its intensity (the average deprivation score experienced by poor people). It can be used to create a comprehensive picture of people living in multidimensional poverty, and permits comparisons both across countries and regions, and within countries by ethnic group, urban or rural area, age as well as other key household and community characteristics. The MPI offers a valuable complement to income-based poverty measures. For more details see Technical note. 

The 2024 release of the MPI presents estimates for 112 developing countries with a combined population of 6.3 billion (78.1% of the world total). About 1.1 billion people in the countries covered—18.3% of the entire population—live in multidimensional poverty. We could not include other developing countries due to data constraints as comparable data on each of the indicators were not available. There was also a decision not to use data from surveys conducted earlier than 2012.

The MPI relies on two main databases that are publicly available and comparable for most developing countries: the ICF Macro Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) and the UNICEF’s Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey (MICS). For several countries, national household surveys with the same or similar content and questionnaires are used: Bhutan, 2022 Bhutan Living Standards Survey; Plurinational State of Bolivia, 2016 Encuesta de Demografía y Salud; Botswana, 2015/2016 Multi-Topic Household Survey; Brazil, 2015 Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios; China, 2014 China Family Panel Studies; Ecuador, 2018 Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición; Jamaica, 2018 Jamaica Survey of Living Conditions; Libya, 2014 Pan Arab Population and Family Health Survey; Mexico, 2022 Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutricion; Morocco, 2017/2018 Pan Arab Population and Family Health Survey; Peru, 2022 Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar; Seychelles, 2019 Quarterly Labor Force Survey; and Sri Lanka, 2016 Demographic and Health Survey. 

Table 1 of the 2024 release of the MPI indicates for each country if data come from the DHS, MICS or from a national survey.

Since the 2014 Human Development Report (HDR), the statistical programmes used to calculate the MPI have been available at the Human Development Report Office’s (HDRO) website. The statistical programs associated with the MPI 2024 are available online for a large selection of countries (https://hdr.undp.org/mpi-statistical-programmes). 

In 2020 HDRO released, for the first time, programs that calculate the MPI in R, a free software available at https://www.r-project.org/.  

Also, DHS and MICS data are publicly available online. Therefore, national governments, civil society groups, and research communities can replicate the MPI results as well as adapt the programmes to their own country-specific poverty needs.

The MPI was first developed in 2010 by OPHI and UNDP for the UNDP’s flagship Human Development Reports. In February 2012 and March 2013, a critical review of the family of human development indices including the MPI was conducted during the two conferences on measuring human progress organized by UNDP. As an outcome of these critical reviews, several adjustments were made to the MPI. They were justified on the grounds of being more in line with the MDGs. At that time, OPHI continued publishing their own estimates using the original 2010 specifications. In 2018, OPHI and UNDP revised and unified the MPI methodology, and the joint work is available at both OPHI’s and UNDP’s websites. The MPI estimates and analysis are expected to be updated at least once per year to include newly released microdata. 

The new round of adjustments to the MPI introduced in 2018 were justified on the grounds of being more in line with the 2030 Agenda. Since 2018 the MPI is therefore a contribution to the implementation and monitoring of Sustainable Development Goal 1 which aims to end poverty in all its forms everywhere, and to the achievement of the Agenda’s ambition and fundamental principle of “Leaving No One Behind”. 

The difference between the previous approaches stands in the definition of deprivations for some of the indicators. 

• Health dimension: 

- Nutrition: a household is deprived if there is a stunted or an underweight child (instead of only stunted). Adults above 20 years are considered malnourished if their BMI is below 18.5 kg/m2; for individuals aged 15-19 years age-specific BMI z scores, defined by WHO, are calculated. 

- Child mortality: a household is deprived if any child has died in the family in the five-year period preceding the survey. This captures recent improvements in child mortality. When the survey lacks information about the date of the child death, mortality that occurred anytime is used. 

In 2019 a methodological adjustment was applied to child mortality. Following the Convention on the Rights of the Child, a child is defined as a person below the age of 18. With this new adjustment, the death of an offspring reported by a mother does not count as a deprivation if the death occurred when the son or daughter was above the age of 18. Previously, there was no age limit and child was understood as a son or daughter of any age. 

• Education dimension: 

- School attainment: a household is deprived if no member aged 10 years or older has completed at least six years of schooling. Six years is the duration of primary education in most countries, so this change reinforces SDG 4 “Quality education.” 

In 2020 we adjusted the years of schooling indicator by introducing a country-specific age cutoff: No household member of ages 'school entrance age + six' or older has completed six years of schooling. 

Previously, the age cutoff was 10 years, but this did not recognize the fact that by age 10 children do not normally complete 6 years of schooling. For example, if the official school entrance age is 6, a child would normally complete 6 years of schooling by age 12; therefore, children of ages 10 or 11 should be considered ineligible for years of schooling. If, as an exception, children of ages 10 or 11 completed 6 years of schooling, this is counted as an achievement. Note that this adjustment has been implemented since 2020 but it was not applied to previous estimates. Although this adjustment is conceptually better, the effect on the empirical estimates is minimal. 

- School attendance: a household is deprived if any school-aged child is not attending school up to the age at which he/she would complete grade 8. 

• Standard of living:

- Housing: a household is deprived if it has inadequate housing in at least one of the three: the floor is of natural materials or the roof or the walls are of rudimentary materials. 

- Asset ownership: a household is deprived if it does not own more than one of these assets: radio, TV, telephone, computer, animal cart, bicycle, motorbike, or refrigerator, and does not own a car or truck. 

- Electricity, improved sanitation, improved drinking water and cooking fuel remain the same. 

Further details about the original MPI methodology from 2010 can be found in Alkire and Santos (2010) https://ophi.org.uk/sites/default/files/2024-03/OPHI-wp38_with_note.pdf

Further details about the UNDP/HDRO revised methodology from 2014 can be found in Kovacevic and Calderon (2014) http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/undp’s-multidimensional-poverty-index-methodology-paper-2014 

Further details about the jointly revised methodology can be found in: Alkire and Jahan (2018) http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/new-global-mpi-2018-aligning-sustainable-development-goals 

The indicators included in the 2010 MPI were drawn from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These original MPI indicators related to MDG indicators: nutrition (MDG 1), child mortality (MDG 4), access to drinking water (MDG 7), access to sanitation facility (MDG 7) and use of an improved source of cooking fuel (MDG 9).

With the subsequent adjustments of the methodology, the 2018 revision of the MPI is a contribution to the implementation and monitoring of Sustainable Development Goal 1 which aims to end poverty in all its forms everywhere, and to the achievement of the Agenda’s ambition and fundamental principle of “Leaving No One Behind”. In addition, national measures of Multidimensional Poverty may directly serve the purpose of monitoring SDG Indicator 1.2.2 (proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions).

The global MPI shows the overlapping deprivations of people sharing the same household across ten indicators that relate to SDGs 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 11. In doing so, it provides a policy tool that can inform policies that seek to address interlinked SDGs and their targets.

The number of people living in multidimensional poverty is computed using the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division’s total population data for the year 2022 for all countries. This approach assumes a constant headcount ratio (obtained by applying the MPI methodology to the survey) which implies an assumption of no change in multidimensional poverty rates between the year of the survey and 2022. 

In addition, every year the release of the MPI provides the number of people living in multidimensional poverty during the year of the survey. In countries with surveys conducted in a two-year period, i.e., 2015/2016, the population of the second year is used. 

Total population data was obtained from World Population Prospects: The 2024 Revision. New York. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/. Accessed 14 June 2024.

The 2024 MPI relies on the most recent and reliable data available since 2012. The difference in dates limits direct cross-country comparisons, as circumstances may have improved, or deteriorated, in the intervening years. This is the reason why we do not rank countries based on the MPI value. 

Data for the 2024 MPI are from 2012–2023, though 3.3 billion of the 6.3 billion people covered and 747 million people of the 1.1 billion identified as multidimensionally poor are captured by surveys from 2018 or later (70 of the 112 countries covered and 25 of those countries have data fielded in 2020 or later).

The MPI methodology shows aspects in which multidimensionally poor people are deprived and helps revealing inter-connections among those deprivations. This enables policymakers to target resources and design policies more effectively. This is especially useful where the MPI reveals areas or groups characterized by severe deprivations. 

The multidimensional poverty approach can be adapted using indicators and weights that are more relevant to national context at the country level to create tailored national poverty measures. The MPI can be useful as a guide to help governments tailor a poverty measure that reflects local indicators and data. In 2009, Mexico became the first country to adopt a measure of multidimensional poverty as an official national statistic. 

The MPI methodology can be, and often is, modified to generate national measures of multidimensional poverty that reflect local, cultural, economic, climatic and other factors. Such national measures of multidimensional poverty may directly serve the purpose of monitoring SDG Indicator 1.2.2 (proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions). The MPI was devised as an analytical tool to measure and monitor acute multidimensional poverty across nations.

The MPI has some drawbacks, due mainly to data constraints. 

• The indicators may not reflect capabilities but instead reflect outputs (such as years of schooling) or inputs (such as cooking fuel). 
• The health dimension indicators are not consistently collected across countries and overlook some groups’ deprivations, especially for nutrition, though the patterns that emerge are plausible and familiar. 
• Child deaths that occurred at any time (instead of in the last 5 years previous to the survey) are used in 9 countries because the survey did not collect the date of child deaths.  
• In some situations, careful judgments were needed to address data that was not collected. For example, data on nutrition was not collected for children older than 5 years in both DHS and MICS, data on adult nutrition was not collected in MICS, data on adult nutrition was collected only for women of ages 15 and 49 in DHS (though in a small number of countries it was collected for men), and child mortality was not collected in households without women of reproductive age. In these situations, households without eligible members to be measured for nutrition and without eligible members to report child mortality are assumed to be not deprived in these indicators. This is a strong assumption that may bias the results and we are conducting research to find a better alternative. However, to be considered multidimensionally poor, households must be deprived in at least six standard of living indicators or in three standard of living indicators and one health or education indicator, or in two health or education indicators. This requirement makes the MPI less sensitive to such assumption. 
• Intra-household inequalities may be severe, but these could not be captured. 
• While the MPI goes well beyond a headcount ratio to include the intensity of poverty, it does not measure inequality among the poor, although a separate measure of inequality has been published since 2019 (variance of individual deprivation scores of poor people). Also, decompositions by groups can be used to reveal group-based inequalities. 
• The estimates presented are mostly based on publicly available data and cover various years between 2012 and 2023, which limits direct cross-country comparability.

The MPI can be used to study changes in multidimensional poverty patterns over time providing that the data at different points in time and MPI estimates are strictly harmonized. If estimates are not harmonized, readers are advised to carefully interpret the changes over time for a particular country because different indicators could be missing from the surveys. 

This year, we are releasing changes over time estimates for 86 countries with suitable surveys. These estimates are presented in Table 2 of the 2024 MPI publication. This table presents harmonized estimates, and it allows for a strict comparison across time within a country. The harmonization process aligns the indicator definitions, meaning that, where necessary, this process re-creates the indicators in the global MPI so that they are using the same information and deprivation cutoffs in both years. For instance, if a survey in one year collects nutrition information from children under 5 years and for women aged 15–49 years and in the other year it collects nutrition information from children under 5 years only, the harmonized computations will only use information from children under 5 in both years, the common denominator, so that any change in the nutrition indicator is due to a change in the nutritional status of children rather than the inclusion of a group of women who may tend to be more (or less) undernourished. 

Users are advised to distinguish between the unharmonized estimates in table 1 and the harmonized estimates in table 2. The MPI table 1 represents the best possible MPI estimate for a particular year and survey and include all the information that is available, while the MPI table 2 allows for a strict comparison across time (within a country) by removing the components that were not collected in the previous point in time. Unharmonized and harmonized estimates may be identical in some cases, but they may differ in many others.

Because the standard survey data used to estimate the global MPI measure are collected in differing intervals, the ability to detect changes depends upon the frequency of available data. The MPI will reflect the impacts of shocks as far as these cause children to leave primary education or to become undernourished, or lose adequate housing, for example. If more frequent data are available at the country level, this can be used to seek to capture the effects of larger scale economic and other shocks. 

The MPI will be a valuable tool to measure the impact of COVID-19 and how the crisis has affected many of the indicators such as nutrition, school attendance, years of schooling and housing. The surveys used for the calculation of the 2024 MPI are mostly pre-COVID-19 pandemic, but the 2024 MPI covered 24 countries with the survey fielded in 2021 or later. Availability of future surveys will help to reveal the impact of the pandemic on multidimensional poverty.

Including income as an indicator might imply double counting people’s deprivations. The standard of living dimension of the MPI acts as a proxy for economic wellbeing. The MPI, which also includes other dimensions of wellbeing, should be seen as a complementary measure of income poverty that goes beyond the monetary aspect of people’s lives. 

An interesting analysis would be to explore the overlap between income poverty and multidimensional poverty, i.e., to distinguish those who are income poor and multidimensionally poor versus those who are poor according to one concept only or those who are not poor at all. However, income data come from different surveys, and these surveys often do not have information on the health dimension. For most countries, we are not able to identify whether the same people are income poor and also deprived in the MPI indicators.